SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 6986

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NASIR AHMAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

NAVIN CHAWLA, J.

1. These appeals have been preferred by the appellants assailing the judgment dated 01.05.2003 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as ‘Trial Court’) in S.C. No. 205/1997 (arising out of FIR No. 569/96 registered at Police Station Hauz Khas, New Delhi), vide which the appellants were convicted for offences punishable under Section 148 and Sections 302, 307 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’).

2. The appellants further challenge the Order dated 05.05.2003 passed by the learned Trial Court, whereby they were sentenced to undergo:

a. imprisonment for life with fine of Rs.500/- each, with simple imprisonment for three months in default, for offences under Sections 302 and 149 of the IPC.

b. rigorous imprisonment for three years with fine of Rs. 1,000/- each, with simple imprisonment for three months in default, for offences under Sections 307 and 149 of the IPC.

It was further directed that any period during which the convicts remained in custody during the inquiry, investigation and trial would be set off against the sentences awarded under Sections 307 and 149 of the IPC.

CASE OF THE PROSECUTIO

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top