SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 7163

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
BUDHIRAJA ELECTRICALS – Appellant
Versus
PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) – Respondent


CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR

J U D G M E N T

HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.

1. The Objection Petition, being O.M.P. (COMM.) 207/201711 Objection Petition, has been instituted under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 199622 A&C Act, seeking setting aside of the Arbitral Award dated 26.10.2016, as revised on 07.01.201733 Arbitral Award, rendered by the learned Sole Arbitrator insofar as it pertains to Claim Nos. 3 and 6, along with the corresponding claims relating to interest.

2. The Enforcement Petition, being O.M.P.(ENF.)(COMM.) 46/201844 Enforcement Petition, has been filed under Order XXI Rules 10 and 11 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and Section 36 of the A&C Act, seeking enforcement of the aforesaid Impugned Arbitral Award.

3. It is pertinent to note that both the aforesaid proceedings arise from the same Arbitral Award. While the Objection Petition calls into question the validity and sustainability of the Impugned Arbitral Award, the Enforcement Petition seeks its enforcement. In such circumstances, it is expedient that the challenge to the Arbitral Award under Section 34 of the A&C Act be considered prio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top