SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Del) 7229

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MADHYA BHARAT POWER CORPORATION LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
VOITH HYDRO PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent


JUDGMENT

AMIT BANSAL, J.

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (‘Act’) seeking setting aside of the Award dated 31st July, 2019 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal (‘Award’).

2. The petitioner (respondent in the arbitration proceedings) shall hereinafter be referred to as ‘Madhya Bharat’ or ‘the Employer’ and the respondent (claimant in the arbitration proceedings) shall hereinafter be referred to as ‘Voith Hydro’ or ‘the Contractor’.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

3. Brief facts relevant for the adjudication of present dispute are as follows.

4. Madhya Bharat entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with the Government of Sikkim by which Rongnichu Hydro Project (‘RHEP’) in Sikkim was allotted to Madhya Bharat.

5. Madhya Bharat had split RHEP into five different packages, one of which was for Electro Mechanical Works (‘E&M’). Tender was floated by Madhya Bharat for E&M in respect of which Voith Hydro submitted its bid. A Letter of Intent was issued to Voith Hydro on 21st June, 2011. Thereafter, Voith Hydro was awarded the Contract for Electro Mechanical works for the 96 MGW Rongnichu Hydro Project in the State of Sikkim.

6. On 28th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top