Back
TRIPURA HIGH COURT
string, string
Md. Monohar Khan Tripura v. Tripura Administration
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts regarding bail bond forfeiture and its procedural steps. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments about the forfeiture process and proper notifications provided. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. discussion on the validity of surety bonds versus the required personal bonds. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. emphasizing the need for strict adherence to procedural laws. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. final outcome and court observations on procedural integrity. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
1. This is a revision against the order of the District Magistrate dismissing the appeal petition filed under S. 515 CrPC by which the District Magistrate confirmed the order of the Munsif - Magistrate, Dharmanagar forfeiting the two bail bonds given by the petitioner as surety for two of the accused persons in G. R. case No. 14 of 1957 in which they were charged under S. 324 IPC and issuing distress warrant for payment of the amount so forfeited.
2. The petitioner is a pleader practising in Dharmanagar Courts. He stood surety for the two accused Muchabbir Ali and Taleb Ali in the above case and he executed two surely bonds on 05/12/1958 agreeing to produce them in Courts on the dates to which the case was posted. On 08/05/1959 Muchabbir Ali and T
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
