SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 21

ASSAM AND NAGALAND HIGH COURT
Nayudu, CJ
Prem Chand Jain v. State


Table of Content
1. circumstances of the paddy seizure. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. findings on the accused's violation. (Para 4 , 5)
3. employment of clause 3 in establishing guilt. (Para 6 , 8)
4. relevance of prior case law in the proceedings. (Para 7 , 9)
5. outcome regarding the conviction and order. (Para 10 , 11)

1. This is a reference under S.438, CrPC made by the learned. Sessions Judge, Goalpara with recommendation for setting aside the impugned order and for return of paddy or the sale price thereof to the accused - petitioner.

2. The petitioner's shop at Sukchar was searched by the Supply Inspector on 12-11-65 and found a stock of 58 bags of Ahu paddy weighing 34.80 quintals and the paddy was seized. The accused - petitioner could not produce any license for dealing in paddy as required under Clause 3 of the Assam Foodgrains (Licensing and Control) Order, 1961 (hereinafter called the 'Assam O.1961'). The Supply Inspector submitted an offence report against the petitioner with necessary sanction for prosecution under S. 7 of the Essential Commodities Act for violation of the provisions of the said Clause of the Assam O.1961. The case was tried summarily by the learned Magistrate as pro





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top