SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 5

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
,
Chitta Ranjan Kar v. State of Tripura and Others


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. B. Das
For the Respondents: Mr. T.D. Majumder

1. This petition under S.114 read with O.47 of the CPC is filed for review of the judgment and decree dated 4-12-2006 passed in R. F. A. 39 of 2001 dismissing the appeal of the appellant petitioner on merit in absence of the learned Counsel for the parties, preferred under S.96 read with O.41 of the CPC against the judgment and decree dated 25-9-2001 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Court No. 1, West Tripura, Agartala in Money Suit No. 25, of 2000, whereby, the claim of the appellant petitioner was rejected.

2. Aggrieved by, the appellant petitioner filed special leave petition before the Hon'ble Supreme Court seeking special leave to Appeal (Civil) No. 6149 of 2007 which was also dismissed on withdrawal. The order of the Apex Court reads as follows :
"Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this petition stating that she will move the High Court.
The Special Leave Petition is dismissed as withdrawn."

3. The case of the appellant petitioner was that he was issued work order for the work of construction of Sale Hall at Sundar Tilla Market under Mohanpur (Sidhal) vide No. F. 4(14) Agri / EE / W / 85-86/3406-11 dated 7-3-1986 and for the work of constructio


























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top