Back
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
,
Chitta Ranjan Kar v. State of Tripura and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition is for review of judgment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. issues framed and evidence presented. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. questions of maintainability arise. (Para 8) |
| 4. arguments on jurisdiction and review criteria. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. discussion on court fees and indigent status. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. provisions of cpc concerning review and jurisdiction. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 7. discussion on error apparent and review limitations. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 8. court's inherent power to correct errors. (Para 22 , 23) |
| 9. justice must prevail over technicalities. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 10. discussion of past judgments allowing review. (Para 27 , 28) |
| 11. court must rectify apparent mistakes. (Para 29 , 30) |
| 12. review application based on procedural errors. (Para 31 , 32) |
| 13. distinguishing reasons for relief under different provisions. (Para 33 , 34) |
| 14. finding that dismissal should be treated as default. (Para 35) |
| 15. prior proceedings to slp not detrimental. (Para 36) |
| 16. order restoring the appeal for re-hearing. (Para 37 , 38) |
1. This petition under S.114 read with O.47 of the CPC is filed for review of the judgment and decree dated 4-12-2006 passed in R. F. A. 39 of 2001 dismissing
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
