Back
TRIPURA HIGH COURT
A, J
Sri Anukul Nath – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. case initiated due to a complaint of sexual offence. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. prosecution presented witnesses to establish the case. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. inconsistencies and credibility issues with testimony of minor witnesses. (Para 19 , 20 , 22 , 28) |
| 4. court finds the need for corroborating evidence due to delays and potential biases. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
1. Heard Mr. R. Datta, learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as Mr. A. Roy Barman, learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State - respondent.
The present appeal is directed against the impugned judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 20.12.2017, passed by the learned Special Judge, North Tripura, Dharmanagar, in connection with the Case No. Special (POCSO) 14 of 2016, whereby and whereunder the appellant was convicted under S.8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act,2012 and thereby sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 4(four) years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) and in default to pay the fine to suffer R.I. for 6(six) months.
2. On the basis of a written complaint dated 08.09.2016 lodged by one Pranath Nath, the father of the victim girl, the Office
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
