SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 334

TRIPURA HIGH COURT
A, J
Sri Anukul Nath – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. R. Datta
For the Respondents: Mr. A. Roy Barman

1. Heard Mr. R. Datta, learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as Mr. A. Roy Barman, learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State - respondent.
The present appeal is directed against the impugned judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 20.12.2017, passed by the learned Special Judge, North Tripura, Dharmanagar, in connection with the Case No. Special (POCSO) 14 of 2016, whereby and whereunder the appellant was convicted under S.8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act,2012 and thereby sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 4(four) years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) and in default to pay the fine to suffer R.I. for 6(six) months.

2. On the basis of a written complaint dated 08.09.2016 lodged by one Pranath Nath, the father of the victim girl, the Officer - in - Charge of Kanchanpur Police Station had registered an FIR against the appellant herein. The complaint so lodged disclosed the fact that on 05.09.2016 both his son Sri Partha Nath and his daughter Papiya Nath went to the house of their neighbour Sri Anukul Nath, the appellant herein to watch television when Sri Anukul Nath, the appellant took his 9 years


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top