SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 7419

TRIPURA HIGH COURT
, CJ
Smt. Priyashi Datta (Debnath) – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent
W.P.(C) (PIL) 25 OF 2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms. A. Debbarma
For the Respondents: Mr. D. Bhattacharya, Mr. S. Saha

Custodial torture violates Article 21 of the Constitution, giving rise to a right to compensation for breach of fundamental rights.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 21 - Human rights and custodial torture - Suo motu cognizance taken by the court following a newspaper report of custodial torture of an individual while in police lockup - The victim, Smt. Priyashi Datta, presented medical evidence of injuries sustained during her detention. The State's claim of no custodial torture contradicted by substantial medical documentation, establishing the victim was beaten during police interrogation. (Paras 10, 11, 14, 20, 21)

(B) Right to Compensation - Monetary compensation awarded to the victim for violation of fundamental rights under Article 21 due to custodial torture, amounting to Rs.2,50,000/- to be paid by the State. (Paras 20, 21)

(C) Responsibility of State - The court emphasized the duty of the police to respect human rights and the necessity of safeguarding against custodial violence. (Para 20)

Facts of the case:
A newspaper highlighted allegations of custodial torture against the victim, leading the court to initiate proceedings. Medical reports confirmed the victim's injuries, contradicting police claims of her well-being.

Findings of Court:
The court established that the victim was tortured in custody, violating her right to life and dignity.

Issues: The court addressed whether custodial torture occurred and the corresponding responsibility of the police and State.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that violations of human rights warrant compensation under Article 21, establishing a precedent for accountability in cases of custodial abuse.

Result: The State directed to pay Rs.2,50,000/- to the victim as compensation.

Table of Content
1. police action based on unverified allegations. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court's order for medical records compliance. (Para 3)
3. victim's medical treatment and affidavit. (Para 4 , 5 , 7)
4. contradictions in police claims and medical reports. (Para 8 , 11 , 12)
5. evidence of custodial torture discussed. (Para 9 , 10 , 13 , 14)
6. rights violations during detention noted. (Para 15 , 20)
7. judicial precedents on custodial rights and remedies. (Para 16 , 17 , 18)
8. monetary compensation for violations established. (Para 21 , 22)

1. On October 28, 20021, a news item came to be published in a local daily namely, Pratibadi Kalam reporting custodial torture on a 28 years' old woman namely, Smt. Priyashi Datta (Debnath) of Chanmari in the police lockup of GB TOP on 26.10.2021 as a result of which she was admitted in AGMC and GBP Hospital at Agartala. The Chief Justice took suo motu notice of this grave and serious issue on the basis of the said newspaper report and pursuant to his direction this Public Interest Litigation came to be registered. Notices were issued to the State- respondents including the Secretary, Home Department, Government of Tripura and Director General of Police.

2. On 18.12.2021, the Under Secretary to the Home Department filed an affidavit contending as under:
'2. That, this affidavit is prepared to apprise the Hon'ble Court by furnishing facts in regards to the present situation of the aforementioned case as stated below:
On 23.10.2021 at about 1600 hrs a telephonic information was received by GB TOP as well as OC NCC P.S regarding missing of 8 (eight) bhori Gold ornaments from the house of one Laxmi Rani Ghosh of East Chanmari and there was a strong suspicion that her immediate neighbours Babul Debnath 37 years, S/o Lt. Jagadish Debnath of East Chanmari and his wife Smt. Piyusi Datta (Debnath) 28 years were involved in the matter.
On 26.10.2021 at 1155 hrs while Smt. Piyushi Datta (Debnath) was examined at GB TOP by women officer and staff namely W/ASI Hemlata Debbarma and W/C Pushpa Rani Sarkar in connection with the matter. This refers to GB TOP GDE No 10, dated-26-10-2021. Suddenly during examination at about 1215 hrs she reported that she was not feeling well. Thereafter, she was immediately shifted to GBP Hospital. This refers to GB TOP GDE No.12, dated-26-10- 2021. After careful medical examination the attending doctor of Emergency OPD namely Dr. Anish Majumder had opined that she was fit, healthy and mentally alert. After completion of medical examination, she was allowed to go home at about 1240 hrs. This refers to GB TOP GDE No.13 dated-26-10-2021. It is also to mention here that no CCTV camera is available at GB TOP.
Again, on the same day at about 2240 hrs, a group of local people of East Chanmari under the leadership of one Sri Mithun Das Baishnab appeared at NCC P.S and alleged that Smt. Piyushi Datta (Debnath) was called at GBP outpost and she was beaten by W/ASI Hemlata Debbarma and w/c Pushpa Rani Sarkar on 26.10.2021. The matter was entered in the GD of NCC P.S vide No-38 dated 26.10.2021 and an enquiry was initiated.
During enquiry, it was learnt from the family members of Smt. Piyushi Datta that on 26.10.2021 in the evening time Smt. Piyushi Datta was admitted to GB Hospital by her family members due to some health complications. She was under treatment at GB Hospital w.e.f 26.10.2011 and discharged from the Hospital on 01.11.2021. During her treatment, Police talked to her attending doctors of Female Surgical Ward-II and it was learnt that Smt. Piyushi Datta was suffering from deficiency of hemoglobin for which 2(two) units blood was given to her along with other medicines. No other medical report is available with police. For this, a requisition has been submitted to the Medical Superintendent of AGMC and GBP Hospital to provide the 'Bed Head Ticket' of Smt. Piyushi Datta, which is not yet received.'





3. In view of the statements in paragraph 2 of the affidavit, the following order was pass













































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top