Back
TRIPURA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AGARTALA
* U. B. Saha (President), Dr. Chhanda Bhattacharyya (Member), Kamalendu Bikash Das (Member)
Sri Pranab Das – Appellant
Versus
TATA AIA Life Insurance Company Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dismissal of complaint due to non-compliance with policy. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. evidence presented in the district commission hearings. (Para 3 , 7 , 10) |
| 3. arguments presented by both parties concerning policy terms. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 4. court interpretation of contractual obligations under insurance law. (Para 14 , 16) |
| 5. final judgment rendered based on evidence and arguments. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 5.2.2021 passed by the learned District Commission (hereinafter referred to as District Commission), West Tripura, Agartala in Case No. C.C. 50 of 2019 whereby and where under the learned District Commission dismissed the complaint petition filed by the complainant, the appellant herein, being devoid of merit.
2. . Heard Mr. Amrit Lal Saha, learnee Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant (hereinafter referred to as complainant) as well as Mr. Sampad Choudhury, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents (hereinafter referred to as opposite party No. 1, 2 and 3 or opposite parties / Insurance Company).
3. The material averments in the complaint case are as follows:
4. The complainant, Sri Pranab Das, the appe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
