Back
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
KALYAN RAI SURANA, SHAMIMA JAHAN
Tara Bhanu W/O Lt Nizam Uddin – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the writ petition, facts of the case, and summary of the voluminous oral and documentary evidence presented at the tribunal level. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. summary of the parties' contentions regarding the appreciation of evidence and the validity of the impugned tribunal opinion. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 3. determination of admissibility of documents, explicitly noting that unauthorized use of the state emblem or withholding disclaimers renders evidence unreliable and potentially misleading. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. requirement to prove material facts and the impact of non-disclosure and inconsistencies in family data on the credibility of the citizenship claim. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 24) |
| 5. adherence to section 9 of the foreigners act, 1946, placing the absolute burden of proof on the proceedee to establish citizenship. (Para 23 , 25 , 26 , 31 , 32 , 39) |
| 6. procedural compliance in the reference process, including the validity of references initiated by the ero in the absence of challenges at the trial stage. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 7. limitation of certiorari jurisdiction, prohibiting interfere |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
