THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
SOUMITRA SAIKIA, J.
Partha Sarathi Paul, S/o - Late Chittaranjan Paul – Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Assam Rep. By The Principal Secretary To The Govt Of Assam, Health And Family Welfare Deptt. And Ors. – Respondents
WP(C)/3918 of 2019
Decided On : 22-04-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual overview of transfer disputes and resulting service gaps. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. prior litigation history and administrative processing of pension files. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 9) |
| 3. absence of petitioner's default in service gaps and duties. (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. application of pension rules and office memorandums for timely settlement. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. mandatory directive for administrative resolution of pension entitlements. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
JUDGMENT :
SOUMITRA SAIKIA, J.
Heard Md. M. U. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner; also heard Mr. C. Boruah, learned Standing Counsel, AG, Mr. D. Upamanyu, learned Standing Counsel, Health Department.
2. The petitioner before this court is praying for a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to regularize the service period of the petitioner, for a period from 07.03.2002 to 26.11.2007, and as to whether the consequential orders or directions should not be issued to the respondents. The release of the final pension of the petitioner as well as other terminal benefits including GPF, GIS, leave encashment certificate in view of unutilized earned leave, along with any unpaid pay or allowances of the petitioner for the aforementioned period.
3. The facts of the case in a nutshell is that the petitioner was serving as a government doctor, working as a Senior Medical and Health Officer at Nilambajar PHC. During his tenure, he was transferred and posted against the vacant post of Kalain CHC by way of transfer order dated 07.01.2002. The petitioner was not initially released, but subsequently released on 06.03.2002, and after that he proceeded to Kalain CHC to take charge in terms of the said transfer order. However, there was no vacancy available at Kalain CHC, and subsequently the order of the petitioner was modified by notification dated 19.03.2002, whereby the petitioner was transferred to Nilambazar PHC to Kalain CHC and one Dr. Badal Das, who was posted at Kalai CHC was transferred to Nilambazar PHC. After receiving the said notification dated 19.03.2002, when the petitioner again proceeded to join his duties, he was not permitted to take over charge as the officer who was supposed to relieve, namely Dr. Badal Das was on leave, and in a meanwhile obtained an order from this court, staying his transfer till his representation preferred before the Department was disposed of.
4. Consequent thereto, by order dated 17.04.2002 a notification was issued staying the transfer of Dr. Badal Das. This situation continued, and subsequently the petitioner was promoted to the post of Sub Divisional Medical and Health Officer by the notification dated 12.11.2007, and was posted at Lokhipur PHC, Cachar; and in the said notification his current place of posting was shown as Kalain CHC. Subsequently, he joined at Lakhipur CHC on 27.11.2007. He served under that Department, and subsequently the petitioner was superannuated on 31.05.2014 as a Deputy Superintendent of Kalain CHC. However, the pension papers pertaining to the petitioner have never been finalized on the ground that the period with effect from 07.03.2002 till 26.11.2007, during which period the petitioner was posted at Kalain CHC, and he could not join in the same post because of the orders passed by the High Court staying the transfer of the officer who was supposed to be relived at Kalain CHC, namely Dr. Badal Das and the subsequent modification of the transfer order itself by the Government. It is submitted that for no fault of the writ petitioner, his pensionary benefits have not been finalized.
5. After repeated representations before the Government, the petitioner has been granted provisional pension, but till date his pension has not been finalized on the ground that the period with effect from 07.03.2002 till 26.11.2007 has not yet been regularized by the appropriate Departments. The Administrative Department had sent the pension proposal to the Accountant General's Office, which ho
The right to receive pensionary benefits is constitutional and cannot be denied based on non-regularization of service, particularly after long continuous service, as it violates principles of fairne....
The entitlement to pension and retirement benefits is a rightful due upon rendering the required length of service, and the authorities' inaction in regularizing a break in service cannot justify den....
Pension and retiral benefits cannot be claimed for absent periods of service without active engagement or duty, affirming ‘No Work, No Pay’ principle.
petitioner has rendered qualifying pensionery service with effect from the date of his initial joining in the department in question, so the same shall be treated as service qualifying for pension an....
Recovery of overpaid pension is permissible despite challenges if prior adjustments remain unaddressed and entitlement errors confirmed.
The responsibility of maintaining and updating service book entries lies with the employer, and pension disbursement is a right governed by rules and regulations.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.