Back
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Sanjay Kumar Medhi, Pranjal Das, JJ
Sukuron Nesa – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishment of the court's jurisdiction over the foreigners tribunal's order based on factual history. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's argument regarding reliance on documentary evidence and linkage requirements. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. respondent's contention regarding the absolute burden of proof on the proceedee under section 9 of the foreigners act. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. legal standard for the burden of proof and the scope of judicial review under article 226. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. evaluation of evidence and rejection of vague pleadings and unreliable documents. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 6. final outcome and dismissal of the writ petition due to lack of merit. (Para 32 , 33 , 34) |
Advocate for the petitioner : Shri J. Ahmed
Advocates for the respondents : Ms. A. Verma, SC- Home Deptt. & NRC,
Shri P. Sarma, GA, Assam;
Shri N. Kalita, for ECI.
Ms. B. Sarma, CGC.
Whether the pronouncement is of the operative part of the
judgment? : NA
Whether the full judgment has been pronounced? : Yes
JUDGMENT & ORDER
(S.K. Medhi, J.)
The extra-ordinary jurisdiction of this Court has been sought to be invoked by filing
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
