Back
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
DILIPBHAI NANABHAI KHACHAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. heard mr. zubin f. bharda (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. learned counsel for the applicant (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. learned counsel for respondent no.2 (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. having heard learned counsel (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. it is also to be noted (Para 10) |
| 6. in view of the above (Para 11) |
| 7. considering the facts and circumstances (Para 12 , 13) |
ORAL ORDER
1. Heard Mr. Zubin F. Bharda, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr.Trupesh Kathiriya, learned APP for the respondent State and Mr.Prerak R. Bhatt, learned counsel for respondent No.2.
2. RULE. Learned advocates waive service of note of rule on behalf of the respective respondents.
3. By way of this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “Cr.P.C.”), the applicant has prayed to quash and set aside the complaint being FIR No.11200048212823 of 2021 registered with Vapi Town Police Station, Valsad, for the offences under Sections 406 , 420 and 503 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that, the impugned FIR is nothing, but an abuse of process of law and filed only with a view to recover the money. He
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
