D.K.JAIN, H.L.DATTU
V. P. SHRIVASTAVA – Appellant
Versus
INDIAN EXPLOSIVES LTD. – Respondent
Certainly! Please provide the legal document content so I can generate the key points with appropriate references.
JUDGMENT
D.K. JAIN, J.: Leave granted.
2. These appeals, by special leave, arise out of the judgment and order dated 28th February 2007, delivered by the High Court of Calcutta in CRR No.2898 of 2004 in a common petition filed by the two appellants herein and one Mr. A.K. Mukherjee, who is now deceased, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short "the Code"). By the impugned judgment, the High Court has declined to quash a private complaint filed by respondent No.1 company against the appellants and Mr. A.K. Mukherjee for offences under Sections 420, 406 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short "the IPC').
3. Shorn of unnecessary details, the facts, material for the purpose of disposal of these appeals may be stated thus: Both the appellants in these appeals were senior employees of the Fertilizer Corporation of India Limited (hereinafter referred to as "FCIL"), a government company within the meaning of Section 617 of the Companies Act, 1956.
4. On 20th April 1992, the FCIL's Board of Directors passed a resolution to the effect that the company had become a sick company within the meaning of the Sick Industrial (Special Provision) Companies Act, 19
All Cargo Movers (India) Private Limited v. Dhanesh Badarmal Jain
Hira Lal Hari Lal Bhagwati v. CBI, New Delhi
Anil Mahajan v. Bhor Industries Ltd.
Onkar Nath Mishra v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Common Cause, A Registered Society v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.