SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 2

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
S. H. Sheth, J.
State of Gujarat v. Mahant Ranchhoddas Guru Atmaramdasji


Advocates:
For the Appellant: Mr. Nanavaty
For the Respondent: Mr. Mehta

Table of Content
1. introduction to the case and the claimant's position. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments regarding maintainability and needed petitions. (Para 4)

1. The State of Gujarat has filed this appeal under the following circumstances.

2. There is a temple situate in Hanuman Pole in Wadi area of Baroda City. One Atrnaramdasji was the Mahant of that temple until he died on 4th October, 1947. He belonged to Ramanandi sect. He was a Nisangi (bachelor). According to the plaintiff, he has been the disciple or Shishya of the late Atmaramdasji who initiated him as a Shishya on 19th December, 1946. According to him, though he was initiated as a Shishya on 19th December, 1946 he was declared as a Shishya by Atmaramdasji on 23rd April, 1947, in the presence of Sadhus, Mahants and other disciples of the sect. He also underwent all ceremonies which were required for becoming a Shishya. He had performed the obsequial ceremonies of Atmaramdasji upon the latter's death and had lit the funeral pyre of the deceased. He, therefore, in his capacity as the Shishya of Atmaramdasji claims to be his lawful heir.

3. On 9th October, 1947 one Sevadas Keshavdas and Maganlal Jagannath made an application to








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top