A.K.SARKAR, S.K.DAS, T.L.VENKATARAMA AYYAR, N.H.BHAGWATI, VIVIAN BOSE
BOMBAY DYEING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF BOMBAY – Respondent
( 1 ) THE appellant is a limited Company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1879. It is carrying on business in the manufacture of textiles , and owns three factories called Spring Mills, Textile Mills and Bombay Dye Works, all of which are situate in Bombay. In its balance sheet for the year 1951, it has shown as one of its liabilities a sum of Rs. 1,65,731-1-0 under the heading "unclaimed wages". This amount is made up of wages earned by the workmen in the factories but remaining undrawn by them, and represents accumulations from year to year ever since the formation of the Company which, it is stated, was about the year 1880. The dispute in this appeal mainly relates to this amount.
( 2 ) IN 1953, the Legislature of the State of Bombay enacted the Bombay Labour Welfare Fund Act (Bom 40 of 1953) (hereinafter referred to as the Act), and it came into force on 4/06/1953. We may, at this stage, refer to the relevant provisions of the Act, as it is their validity that is the main point for our determination in this appeal. The preamble to the Act recites that "it is expedient to constitute a Fund for the financing of activities to promote welfare of lab
Bijay Cotton Mills Ltd. and other v. State of Ajmer
The State of Bombay and another v. F. N. Balsara
R. M. D. Chamarbaugwalla and another v. Union of India and another
Dwarkadas Shrinivas v. The Sholapur Spinning and Weaving Co. Ltd. and others
REFERRED TO : State of West Bengal v. Subodh Gopal Bose and others
The State of Bihar v. Sir Kameshwar Singh
The State of Bombay and another v. The United Motors (India) Ltd. and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.