GUJARAT HIGH COURT
, J
Tower International Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
M.T. Asia V.2 – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of plaint and factual basis for the suit. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments address lack of cause of action against the applicant. (Para 6 , 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 3. court's observations regarding procedural requirements. (Para 7 , 8 , 11) |
| 4. ratio decidendi outlines grounds for dismissing the plaint. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 5. final ruling and outcome of the application. (Para 15 , 16) |
1.The applicant who is original defendant No. 2 in Admiralty Suit No. 3 of 2003 has filed this application for rejection of the plaint on the ground that the plaint does not disclose any cause of action against the applicant and that the plaintiff can have no cause of action against the applicant.
2. It is the case of the original plaintiff, namely, Tower International Ltd. that they had purchased a quantity of 2000 MT of Crude Palm Oil and 1000 MT of Crude Plam Olein from New Continent Enterprises Pte Ltd., original defendant No. 3 on Cost and Freight terms basis delivery at Kandla under Contract dated 11-12-2002 and 24-1-2003 respectively. Payment was to be made by the original plaintiff to the original defendant No. 3 by telegraphic transfer within 35 days from the date of Bills of Lading. Acc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.