Back
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
J.B. Pardiwala, J
Arvindbhai Kantibhai Solanki v. State of Gujarat
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks release of a seized vehicle. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments present the powers and precedents for vehicle release. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's authority to release vehicles is emphasized. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. final decision orders vehicle release with conditions. (Para 9 , 10) |
1. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned APP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of respondent - State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this petition, seeking to invoke extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Art.226 and supervisory jurisdiction under S.227 of the Constitution of India for the release of the muddamal vehicle i.e. MAHINDRA KUV - 100 bearing Registration No.GJ - 03 - KP - 3812.
3. It is the case of the petitioner that on registration of the FIR being C.R. No.III - 594/2019 registered with Chota Udaipur for the offences under the provision of the Gujarat Prohibition Act , the vehicle of the petitioner has been seized as muddamal in connection with the aforesaid offence, however, the said vehicle is duly registered with the transport department of the Government and in support of it, RC Book is placed on record at Page No.16 of the compilation. He farther
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
