SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 454

GUJARAT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AHMEDABAD
Mr. P.A. Jadeja, J
Daramsinh Desai University v. Bhargav Batukbhai Borad


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. P.A. Jadeja

1. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and order dated 8.8.2012 passed by the Kheda District Consumer District Forum at Nadiad in Complaint Case No. 98 of 2012.

2. The appellant has preferred instant appeal on the grounds that the impugned order is arbitrary, perverse and is bad in law. The parties will be referred to as per their original nomenclature for the sake convenience.

3. The brief facts of the case are as under: Complainant got admission in M.B.A. through the Opponent No. 2 and also paid Rs.20,000 as fees, and after that complainant got admission in Vir Narmad South Gujarat University by reshuffling of G.T.U. And after that complainant gave one application to cancel the admission and also demanded back the Rs.20,000 but Opponent denied for that, so after that the Complainant filed the complaint for Rs.20,000 with interest of 12% and Rs.10,000 for mental agony, and the complaint was allowed and directed to pay Rs.20,000 and Rs.2,000 for mental agony.

4. Heard learned Advocate Mr. P.A. Jadeja, respondents are duly served upon but no one remains present on behalf of the respondents side.

5. Here Ld. Advocate Mr. P.A. Jadeja has submitted before me that the Consume













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top