Back
GUJARAT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AHMEDABAD
Mr. P.A. Jadeja, J
Daramsinh Desai University v. Bhargav Batukbhai Borad
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. basis of the appeal and initial complaint. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. jurisdiction of the consumer forum. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments pertaining to cancellation and evidence. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. legal interpretations regarding service provision. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. conclusion drawn by the court regarding the appeal. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
1. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and order dated 8.8.2012 passed by the Kheda District Consumer District Forum at Nadiad in Complaint Case No. 98 of 2012.
2. The appellant has preferred instant appeal on the grounds that the impugned order is arbitrary, perverse and is bad in law. The parties will be referred to as per their original nomenclature for the sake convenience.
3. The brief facts of the case are as under: Complainant got admission in M.B.A. through the Opponent No. 2 and also paid Rs.20,000 as fees, and after that complainant got admission in Vir Narmad South Gujarat University by reshuffling of G.T.U. And after that complainant gave one application to cancel the admission and also demanded back the Rs.20,000 but Opponent denied for that, so after that the Complainant filed the complaint for Rs.20,000 with interest o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
