IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Rakesh Kainthla, J
TEJINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
GOVINDER SINGH AND ORS – Respondent
Rakesh Kainthla, Judge
The present revision is directed against the judgment dated 30.11.2021, passed by learned Sessions Judge, (Forests), Shimla, District Shimla, H.P. (learned Appellate Court), vide which the judgment dated 28.8.2015, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.6, Shimla, H.P. (learned Trial Court) was upheld. (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court. for convenience.)
2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present revision are that the police filed a charge sheet before the learned Trial Court against the accused for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 420 , 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
3. It was asserted that the complainant, Tejinder Singh (PW1), made a complaint (Ex.PW1/A) stating that the accused, Govinder Singh, purchased two parcels of land in Village Durgapur, Pargana Chota bal, Tehsil Suni, District Shimla, HP, vide two separate sale deeds dated 10.4.2008 and 24.6.2008. Two Krishak Praman Patras (agriculturist certificates)-one dated 13.11.2007 and another dated 10.6.2008, were attached to the sale deeds. One Krishank
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.