Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Rakesh Kainthla, J
Dilbag Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of H.P. – Respondent
Rakesh Kainthla, Judge
The present appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 30.04.2024 passed by learned Sessions Judge (Forests), Shimla (learned Trial Court), vide which the appellant (accused before the learned Trial Court) was convicted of the commission of offences punishable under Sections 279 and 304AA of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and was sentenced as under:-
| Sections | Sentences |
| 279 of IPC | The accused was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for six months. P . |
| 304-AA of IPC | The accused was sentenced to undergo rigours imprisonment for seven years, pay a fine of H ₹10,000/-, and in default of payment of the fine, to undergo further simple imprisonment for six f months. o |
| It was ordered that the substantive sentences of t imprisonment shall run concurrently. r u |
(Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience.)
2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the police presented a challan for the commission of offences punishable under Section 279 , 337, 338 and 304-AA of the IPC. It was asserted that information was received in the Po
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
