Back
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
*Deepak Gupta, V. K. Ahuja, JJ.
Vardhman Textiles Ltd. and Others (M/s.) v. State of H.P. and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of petitioners and legal framework (Para 1 , 2 , 5) |
| 2. legal obligations under the h.p. act (Para 3 , 4 , 6 , 15) |
| 3. distinction between processing and manufacturing (Para 9 , 12) |
| 4. analysis of previous case law and implications (Para 16 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. conclusion regarding registration and fees liability (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
1. By this judgment we are disposing of the aforesaid six writ petitions since common questions of law and fact arise for decision in these cases.
2. All the petitioners before us are Spinning Mills engaged in the production of cotton yarn. The petitioners in all the petitioners except in CWP No. 437/2007 manufacture the cotton yarn from cotton. The petitioner in CWP No. 437 of 2007 has alleged that it manufactures the cotton yarn out of cotton waste. All the petitioners have their manufacturing units in the State of Himachal Pradesh. They alleged that they obtain the raw material from outside the State of Himachal Pradesh. The petitioners except in CWP No. 437 of 2007 purchase cotton bales from outside the State of Himachal Pradesh and these cotton bales are brought to their units within Himachal Pradesh and after going through a large num
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
