Back
HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA
Sunita Sharma (Presiding Member), *R. K. Verma (Judicial Member)
Opposite Party – Appellant
Versus
Complainant – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal details and claim rejection basis. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 2. court's review and findings on evidence. (Para 2 , 5 , 8) |
| 3. arguments regarding evidence of intoxication. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. final ruling on appeal merits. (Para 12) |
| 5. order for appeal dismissal and cost indication. (Para 13) |
1. This appeal has been preferred under S.15 of the Consumer Protection Act ,1986 (hereinafter called as the Act) against order dated 29.5.2019 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kinnaur at Rekong Peo, whereby complaint filed by the complainant under S.12 of the Act was partly allowed and the Opposite Party was directed to make payment of Rs.3,37,938 along with interest @ of 9% p.a. from the date of filing complaint till payment. The Opposite Party was further directed to pay a sum of Rs.10,000 towards mental harassment etc. and Rs.5,000 as litigation charges.
2. It would be apposite to mention here that the parties will be referred, as have been arrayed before the District Forum.
3. Brief facts, as averred in the complaint, are that the complainant is registered owner of vehicle No. HP - 25B - 1299, which was insured with the opposite party for the period fr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
