SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(HP) 8936

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KAINTHLA
ASLEEM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HP – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Vijay Panchta ,Respondent Advocate: AG AG

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MPM No. 2629 of 2025 Reserved on: 27.11.2025 Date of Decision: 09.12.2025 _____________________________________________________________

Asleem ....P etitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh ….Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting? No For the Petitioner : Mr. Vijay Panchta, Advocate.

For the Respondent- : Mr. Parshant Sen, Deputy State Advocate General.

Rakesh Kainthla, Judge:

The petitioner has filed the present petition for Hseeking regular bail in FIR No.132/2023, dated 12.12.2023, registered at Police Station Banjar, District Kullu, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 20 and 25 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter called as NDPS Act in short).

_________________________

Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. It has been asserted that the petitioner was f.alsely implicated in the present case. The police have filed a charge sheet, and no fruitful purpose would be served by detaining the petitioner in custody. Petitioner would abide by all the terms & conditions, which the Court fmay impose upon him; he

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top