IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Civil Revision No. 62 of 2024 Reserved. on:18.11.2025 Date ofH decision: 25.11.2025 Bhupinder Kumar Sharma & Anr. …..Petitioners/JDs Versus f Mahadev Gupta ...Respondent/DH Coram:

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge Whether approved for reporting?¹ Yes.

For the petitionoers/JDs : Mr. R. K. Bawa, Senior Advocate, with Mr. O. C. Sharma, Advocate.

For the respondent/DH : Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Ajeet Pal Singh Jaswal, Advocate.

Satyen Vaidya, Judge:

g The petitioners/JDs have invoked the revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short, “CPC”) against the order dated 05.04.2024, passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kasauli, District Solan (H.P.), in Execution Petition No. 1348 of 2019, CNR No. HP S0100003592019.

2. Facts in brief are that the respondent/DH was a tenant in a shop situated in Mauza Dhangyar, P.O. Parwanoo,

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

Tehsil Kasauli, District Solan, H.P., measuring 2.28 x 3.19 square meters (for short, “the shop”). The petitioners/JDPs were the owners of the shop. .

3. The responden