SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(HP) 9052

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KAINTHLA
MOHIT KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HP – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Karan Kapoor Nitish ,Respondent Advocate: AG AG

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MP (M) No. 2498 of 2025 Reserved on: 19.11.2025 Date of Decision: 25.11.2025.

Mohit Kumar ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh t ...Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?1 No.

For the Petitioner : Mr Karan Kapoor, Advocate. For the Respondent/State : Mr Lokender Kutlehria, Additional Advocate General.

Rakesh Kainthla, Judge The petitioner has filed the present petition for seeking regular bail in FIR No. 43 of 2025, dated 26.3.2025, registered at Police Station, Dhalli, District Shimla, H.P., for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 109, 126(2) and 115(2) read with 3(5) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS). 2. It has been asserted that, as per the prosecution, the informant Sanjeev Kumar made a complaint regarding the

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

beating. He was taken to CHC Mashobra from where he was referred to IGMC. The accused met the police on the way to IGMC, and they complained about the beatings given by complainant to them. They were also taken to IGMC for their medical examination. The informant stated

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top