IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Revision No.4064 of 2013 Reserved on: 27.10.2025 Date of Decision:19.11.2025 Raghubir Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh ....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?

For the Petitioner : Ms. Devyani Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Srishti Negi, Advocate.

For the Respondent/ : Mr. Lokender Kutlehria, State Additional Advocate General.

Rakesh Kainthla, Judge The present revision is directed against the judgment dated 11.07.2013 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Solan, Camp at Nalagarh, District Solan, H.P.(learned Appellate Court), vide which judgment of conviction dated 26.02.2011 and order of sentence dated

01.03.2011, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class,

1. Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes

Court No.2, Nalagarh, District Solan, H.P., (learned Trial Court) were upheld. (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the. learned Trial Court for convenience.)

2. Briefly, stated the factsf leading to the present revision are that the police filed a challan a