IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Revision No. 419 of 2025 Reserved on: 10.10.2025 Date of Decision: 14.11.2025 Sunil Kumar ...Petitioner Versus f Surinder Garg o ...Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?¹ No.

For the Petitioner : Mr Arun Kumar, Advocate.

For the Respondoent : None.

Rakesh Kainthla, Judge The present revision is directed against the judgment dated 22.02.2025, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (1), Shimla, H.P. (learned Appellate Court) vide which the judgment of conviction passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.4, Shimla (learned Trial Court) and order of sentence dated 04.11.2023 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Shimla were upheld. (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience.)

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present petition are that the complainant filed a complaint against the accused before the learned Trial Court for the commission of an offence punishable under Section 13