IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Cr. Revision No. 855 of 2024

Reserved on: 21.11.2025

Date of Decision: 15.12.2025

Ankush Kango .... Petitioner

Versus

PNB & others .... Respondent

Coram

Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?¹No

For the Pe titioner : Mr. Vidush Chauhan, Advocate, vice

Mr. Hemant Thakur, Advocate.

For Respondent No.1. : Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate.

For the Respondent : Mr. Prashant Sen, Deputy

No.2/State Advocate General.

Rakesh Kainthla, Judge

The present revision is directed against the judgment

dated 30.11.2025 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Hamirpur, H.P. (learned Appellate Court) vide which the judgment of conviction dated 26.04.2024 and order of sentence dated 27.04.2024 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.3, Hamirpur

1. Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes

(learned Trial Court) were upheld. (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience.)

2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present revision are that the complainant filed a complaint before the learned Trial Court against t