IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

SHIMLA

Cr.Revision No: 707of 2025

Reserved on : 18.11.2025

Decided on : 18.12.2025

Naresh Kumar @ Titu

....Petitioner

Versus

Shimla Fruit Agency

....Respondent

Coram

Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting? No

For the petitioner : Mr. Atul Sharma,

Advocate.

For the respondent : Nemo.

Rakesh Kainthla Judge

The present revision is directed against the

Hjudgment dated 10.03.2025 passed by learned Additional

Sessions Judge (CBI Court), Shimla (learned Appellate Court), vide which the judgment of conviction dated 22.07.2024 and order of sentence dated 30.07.2024 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.1, Shimla, H.P. (learned trial Court) were upheld. (The parties shall hereinafter be referred in the same

Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

manner as they were arrayed before the learned trial Court for convenience). .

2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present petition are that the complainant filed a complaint before the learned Trial Court for the commiss ion of an offence punishable under Section 13o8 of the Negotiable Instruments Act ( for short “NI Act”). It w