IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Revision No.: 35 of 2025 Reserved on: 19.03.2026.

Decided on: 22.04.2026 Rajeev Kumar f...…. Petitioner Versus Kamal Kumar …. Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?¹ No.

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rocky, Advocate.

For the Respondent : Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate Rakesh Kainthla, Judge The present revision is directed against the judgment dated 07.12.2024 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. (learned Appellate Court) vide which judgment of conviction dated 08.07.2024 and order of sentence dated 29.07.2024 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P. (learned Trial Court) were upheld. (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same

Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?Yes.

manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience.) .

2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present revision are that the complainant filed a complaint before the learned Trial Court against the accused for the commission of an offence punishable under Sectoion 138