Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Romesh Verma, J
Poonam Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Tej Ram – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the petition seeks transfer of matrimonial proceedings due to financial hardship and logistical difficulties for the wife. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. judicial precedents establish that the wife's convenience is the prime consideration in matrimonial transfer petitions. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 3. court orders the transfer of the pending case based on the established parameters of convenience. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner/wife for the transfer of the petition bearing HMA Reg. No. 175 of 2025, titled as Tej Ram vs. Poonam Kumari, filed by the respondent/husband before the Court of learned Additional District Judge [Family Court]-Kullu, District Kullu, HP to the Court of learned Additional District Judge, Shimla-II [Family Court], Camp at Theog, District Shimla, H.P. HP.
2. As per the averments made in the petition, respondent has filed a petition for dissolution of marriage by grant of decree for divorce under Section 13-1(i-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the same was registered as Registration No. 175 of 2025, titled Tej Ram vs. Poonam Kumari, which is presently p
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
