SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 4089

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (AHMEDABAD BENCH)
Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member, Narendra Prasad Sinha, Accountant Member
ACIT Central Circle 1(3) – Appellant
Versus
Unicorn Packaging LLP – Respondent
ITA No.893/Ahd/2025|ITA No.894/Ahd/2025|ITA No.895/Ahd/2025|ITA No.896/Ahd/2025|ITA No.897/Ahd/2025|ITA No.898/Ahd/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri Aseem L. Thakkar, AR
For the Respondents: Shri Alpesh Parmar, CIT-DR

Goodwill from amalgamation (excess purchase consideration over net assets) is depreciable intangible asset u/s 32; reassessment u/s 148 beyond surviving TOLA time-limit post-Ashish Agarwal quashed; Rule 8D disallowance invalid without s.14A(2) satisfaction.

Headnote:(A) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 32(1), 14A r.w.r. 8D, 148, 148A - Depreciation on goodwill arising from amalgamation - Goodwill constituting excess of purchase consideration over net book value of assets, determined by SEBI-registered valuer, qualifies as intangible asset eligible for 25% depreciation under Explanation 3 to section 32(1), following Supreme Court in Smifs Securities Ltd. - Coordinate bench decision in initial year binding on successor entities post amalgamation and conversion to LLP - AO cannot disallow merely following prior disallowance without distinguishing facts. (Paras 3, 4, 5, 5.1)

(B) Section 148/148A - Reassessment notice issued beyond surviving time limit under old regime (deemed 148A(b) notice on 30.06.2021) read with TOLA and Supreme Court directions in Ashish Agarwal/Rajeev Bansal - Only 1 day (extended to 7 days) surviving; notice on 25.08.2022 time-barred, proceedings quashed. (Paras 7-8.4)

(C) Assessment in name of non-existing entity post-conversion to LLP - Void ab initio, without jurisdiction per Supreme Court in Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. (Para 12)

(D) Section 14A r.w.r. 8D - AO must record dissatisfaction with assessee's suo moto disallowance before invoking Rule 8D; mechanical application without satisfaction invalid. (Paras 15-17)

Facts of the case:
Assessee LLP, successor via amalgamations and conversion, claimed depreciation on brought-forward goodwill from amalgamation (purchase consideration Rs.555.75 crores over net assets Rs.87.01 crores, balance Rs.468.73 crores as goodwill). AO disallowed citing nil cost in tax-neutral amalgamation and prior year disallowance. Separate appeals involved reassessment time-bar, assessment on non-existing entity, and section 14A disallowance without recorded satisfaction. CIT(A) deleted additions; Revenue appealed.

Findings of Court:
Depreciation on goodwill allowed following coordinate bench in initial year; reassessment quashed as time-barred; assessment on non-existing entity void; section 14A disallowance deleted for lack of recorded dissatisfaction.

Issues: Allowability of depreciation on amalgamation goodwill; validity of reassessment notices under new/old regime timelines; assessment on non-existing entity; invocation of Rule 8D without section 14A(2) satisfaction.

Ratio Decidendi: Goodwill from amalgamation is acquired intangible asset depreciable u/s 32; reassessment must adhere to surviving TOLA limits post-Ashish Agarwal; assessments on non-entities are nullities; Rule 8D requires prior dissatisfaction recording.

Result: All six Revenue appeals dismissed.

Table of Content
1. background of amalgamations and goodwill creation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. goodwill from amalgamation eligible for depreciation. (Para 4 , 5)
3. section 148 notice time-barred under tola extensions. (Para 8)
4. assessment invalid on non-existing entity. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
5. no 14a disallowance without recorded dissatisfaction. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)

आदेश/ORDER 

Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:

The captioned appeals have been preferred by the Revenue against the separate orders of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-11, Ahmedabad [hereinafter referred to as “(CIT(A)”] Since identical facts and issues are involved in these appeals, hence the same were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. ITA No.893/Ahd/2025 preferred against the order of the CIT(A) dated 24.02.2025 for the assessment year 2016-17 is taken as the lead case for the purpose of narration of facts.

ITA 893/AHD/2025:

2. The Revenue in this appeal has taken the following Grounds of Appeal:

1) "The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in deleting the disallowance of Rs.2,64,14,409/- on account of deprecation on goodwill without appreciating the facts of the case and reasons elaborated by the A.O. in the assessment order."

2) "The Ld. CIT(A) has ignored the intricacies of 6th proviso to section 32(1), section 49(1)(iii)(e), Explanation 7 to section 43(1) and/or Explanation 2(b) to section 43(6)(c) and section 55(2)(a)(ii) which established that Depreciation cannot be claimed on goodwill arising out of amalgamation under the existing provision of the Income-tax Act."

3) "The Revenue craves leave to add/alter/armed and/or substitute any or all of the grounds of appeal."

3. The brief facts of the case, as culled out from the assessment order and the impugned order of the CIT(A), are that the assessee is a limited liability partnership firm which filed its return of income for A.Y. 2016-17 on 16.10.2016 declaring total income of Rs.1,42,588/-. The entity has undergone a series of restructuring events: Unicorn Packers Pvt. Ltd. was amalgamated with Urmin Marketing Pvt. Ltd. with appointed date 01.04.2014 pursuant to a scheme of amalgamation approved by the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court vide order dated 27.07.2015; thereafter Urmin Marketing Pvt. Ltd. was amalgamated with Urmin Flavoroma Pvt. Ltd. with appointed date 01.04.2015 in a scheme approved by the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court vide order dated 05.01.2016; subsequently, with effect from 01.03.2016, the name of Urmin Flavoroma Pvt. Ltd. was changed to Unicorn Packaging Pvt. Ltd.; and finally, with effect from 21.03.2016, Unicorn Packaging Pvt. Ltd. was converted into Unicorn Packaging LLP, the present assessee.

3.1. In the first amalgamation, all the assets and liabilities of Unicorn Packers Pvt. Ltd. became the assets and liabilities of Urmin Marketing Pvt. Ltd., and, as recorded both in the assessment for A.Y. 2015-16 and in the present CIT(A) order, the purchase consideration for Unicorn Packers Pvt. Ltd. was determined on the basis of a valuation report of RBSA Capital Advisors LLP, a Category-I merchant banker registered with SEBI. Under the approved scheme, Urmin Marketing Pvt. Ltd. issued 4,50,00,000 equity shares of Rs.10 each at a premium of Rs.113.50 per share (issue price Rs.123.50 per share) against 90,000 equity shares of Unicorn Packers Pvt. Ltd., i.e. in the ratio of 500:1, and the excess of the purchase consideration of Rs.555.75 crores over the net book value of assets and liabilities of Rs.87.01 crores of Unicorn Packers Pvt. Ltd. amounting to Rs.468.73 crores was recorded as goodwill in the books of Urmin Marketing Pvt. Ltd. and depreciation at 25% thereon was claimed for A.Y. 2015-16. In the subsequent amalgamation of Urmin Marketing Pvt. Ltd. with Urmin Flavoroma Pvt. Ltd., and the eventual change of name to Unicorn Packaging Pvt. Ltd., the brought forward goodwill of Rs.351,55,17,685/- was reflected in the books of Unicorn Packaging Pvt. Ltd. and depreciation at 25% amoun

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top