SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(JHK) 9854

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J
UMANG KEJRIWAL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


Oral Order

10 / Dated : 10.10.2023 

All these criminal misc. petitions, raise same questions of fact and law, are being heard together and shall be disposed of by this common order.

1. Cr.M.P. No. 1751 of 2022  has been filed for quashing the entire criminal proceeding including the summoning order dated 29.08.2019 passed in C.P. Case No. 555 of 2018 (Forest) whereby and whereunder, prima facie case has been found to be made out under Sections 33 and 63(c) of Indian Forest Act , 1927.

Cr.M.P. Nos. 2829 of 2022 and 3898 of 2022 have been filed for quashing the entire criminal proceeding including the summoning order dated 29.08.2019 passed in C.P. Case No. 553 of 2018 (Forest) whereby and whereunder, prima facie case has been found to be made out under Sections 33 and 63(c) of Indian Forest Act , 1927.

2. Can a cognizance be quashed in a case concerning protected forest notified under Section 29 of the Indian Forest Act , 1927, alleged to have been encroached and grabbed by private parties, claiming title over the said forest area, is the central question involved in these criminal miscellaneous petitions?

3. In Cr.M.P. Nos. 2829 of 2022 and 3898 of 2022 arises out of C.P. Case No.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top