Back
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, J
Ashok Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. promotion evaluation based on merit and performance. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. necessity of communication regarding performance gradings. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 3. respondent's stance on proper communication not being required. (Para 22 , 23) |
| 4. assessment of acrs and guidelines for dpc. (Para 25 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. legal requirements for communicating entries in acrs. (Para 40 , 42) |
| 6. meanings of communication failures leading to violations of rights. (Para 53 , 54 , 57 , 59) |
JUDGMENT
1. The petitioner through the medium of the instant petition seeks quashment of order dated 08.4.2002 and 21.04.2003, whereby respondents 4 to 15 have been promoted to the post of Additional DIG with reference to the DPC held on 10.01.2002 and 27.03.2003, respectively with a further direction seeking writ of mandamus to promote the petitioner to the post of Additional DIG w.e.f. 08.04.2022 from the date his juniors have been promoted with further direction of seniority and consequential benefits besides seeking quashment of adverse entry of the year 1998- 1999.
FACTS:-
2. The petitioner after undergoing the selection process and on the basis of his merit in the selection process was appo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
