Back
JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT
S. Murtaza Fail Ali, J.N. Bhat, JJ
Government officers – Appellant
Versus
Government of Jammu and Kashmir – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. constitutional validity of provisions and petitions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. classification of petitioners based on service status. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. discussion focus on termination cases. (Para 5 , 7) |
| 4. interpretation of article 226(2) k.c.s.r. (Para 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. arguments regarding constitutionality and application of article 14. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. challenges related to officers on extension and temporary hands. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 7. striking down of invalid provisions and conclusion. (Para 14) |
| 8. judges' agreement on the ruling. (Para 15 , 16) |
1. Thirteen writ petitions have been filed by Government officers in this Court under S.103 of the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir praying that an appropriate writ be issued quashing the orders of the respondent, Government Order No. 312 - C of 1963 and Government Order No. 313 - C of 1963, dated 27th November, 1963 published in the Jammu and Kashmir Government Gazette of 5th December and the Sadar - i - Riyasat's Order No. SR - 37 of 1953 dated 27th November, 1963 as being illegal, void, ineffective, inoperative and ultra vires and that the petitioners be held as continuing to hold their respective posts and offices which they held prio
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
