Back
JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT
Ali Mohammad Magrey, J
Pawan Singh Rathore v. Union Territory of J and K
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges regarding the cjm's order on fir registration. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments concerning the legality and protections available to the petitioners. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. discussion on judicial precedents regarding public servants' prosecutorial protections. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. analysis of the legal framework applicable to public servants in the context of official duties. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. concluding findings and the court's decision to quash the order. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
1. By this common order, the afore - titled two petitions challenging order dated 15.03.2019 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jammu ('CJM' for short) on the applications filed by the private respondents under S.156(3) of CrPC against the petitioners, are proposed to be disposed of.
2. The private respondents filed three separate applications before the learned CJM alleging therein that they are owners in possession of land measuring 30 marlas (10 marlas each) situated at Channi Rama near Railway Road Jammu. It was alleged by the private respondents that they raised construction over their respective portions of the land in question, but Jammu Development Authority
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
