Back
JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT
R. A. Jan, J
Miyan Muzaffer – Appellant
Versus
District Magistrate Srinagar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. detenue detained under public safety act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner challenges detention on multiple grounds. (Para 3) |
| 3. arguments focus on lack of evidence and vague allegations. (Para 4 , 8) |
| 4. respondents assert legality of the detention order. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 5. detenue received necessary medical treatment. (Para 7) |
| 6. respondents claim subjective satisfaction justified the detention. (Para 10) |
| 7. judicial review of detention emphasizes procedural safeguards. (Para 11 , 12 , 19 , 20) |
| 8. legal provisions for preventive detention examined. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 9. court cites precedents on preventive detention standards. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 10. grounds for detention must provide clarity and substance. (Para 17 , 18 , 22) |
| 11. failure to provide material violates rights under article 22. (Para 23) |
| 12. detention order quashed; detainee to be released. (Para 24) |
1. This petition has been filed at the instance of the detenue by his wife, thereby, challenging detention order passed by District Magistrate Srinagar - respondent No. 2, bearing No. DMS / PSA / 17/2024 dated 13.07.2024, for short impugned order, whereby detenue namely Miyan Muzaffer S/o Miyan Mohammad Yousuf R/o Barzulla Bulbulga
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
