Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
E.S.INDIRESH, J
MOHAMMAD AKBAR ABDUL KHASIM SHAIKH – Appellant
Versus
KRISHNA SHANKAR MIRJNKAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. identifies parties and context of review petitions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioners argue for review based on prior judgments. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. counsel presents arguments on natural justice and review limits. (Para 6 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. court examines legal standards for review and errors. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. court's analysis of the review petitions and legal precedents. (Para 15 , 16 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. clarifies the scope of review jurisdiction. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. establishes the ratio decidendi regarding review limitations. (Para 23) |
| 8. final conclusion rejecting the review petitions. (Para 26 , 27) |
CAV ORDER
1. In R.P.No.100088/2014, Review petitioner is assailing the judgment and decree dated 11.02.2014 in RSA No.553/2003. In R.P.No.100119/2014, Review petitioner is challenging the judgment and decree dated 30.01.2014 in RFA No.1549/2003. In R.P.No.100124/2014, Review petitioner is questioning the judgment and decree dated 30.01.2014 in RFA No.1549/2003.
2. Since these Review Petitions are arising out of the division of the property of original propositus – Mangesh Rao and the parties to the Review Petitions claiming succession under the original propositus – Mangesh Rao,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
