Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
E.S.INDIRESH, J
MOHAMMAD AKBAR ABDUL KHASIM SHAIKH – Appellant
Versus
KRISHNA SHANKAR MIRJNKAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. identifies parties and context of review petitions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioners argue for review based on prior judgments. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. counsel presents arguments on natural justice and review limits. (Para 6 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. court examines legal standards for review and errors. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. court's analysis of the review petitions and legal precedents. (Para 15 , 16 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. clarifies the scope of review jurisdiction. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. establishes the ratio decidendi regarding review limitations. (Para 23) |
| 8. final conclusion rejecting the review petitions. (Para 26 , 27) |
CAV ORDER
2. Since these Review Petitions are arising out of the division of the property of original propositus – Mangesh Rao and the parties to the Review Petitions claiming succession under the original propositus – Mangesh Rao, the Review Petitions were heard together and disposed of by this common order.
4. In R.P.No.100119/2014, it is contended in the Review Petition that this Court has not considered the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Kunhayammed and Others vs. State Of Kerala & Another reported in AIR 2000 SC 2587 with regard to implication of Sect
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
