HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR. JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD, MR. JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR, JJ
SRI VAZIRSAB S/O PEERSAB NADAF – Appellant
Versus
SRI H RAMANGOUDAR – Respondent
CAV ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR)
Complainant - writ petitioner has filed the aforesaid complaint alleging disobedience of the direction given in WP.No.103916/2018 dated 18.07.2024 by the accused. Respondent/accused has filed the aforesaid writ appeal challenging the order passed by the Single Judge of this Court. As both these complaint and writ appeal arise out of a similar order, with the consent of both side, they are taken up for disposal together.
2. The order dated 18.07.2024 passed in WP No.103916/2018 by the learned Single Judge of this Court is the subject matter of challenge in the present appeal whereby, it is ordered that:
“…..the petitioner-workman would be entitled for all the consequential benefits with the continuity of service. The order of the Labour Court is modified accordingly”.
The petitioner-workman is stated to have been retired from service, the respondent-management shall process the requisition of the petitioner for release of his retirement benefit as expeditiously as possible. The entire process shall be completed within an outer limit of two [2] months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.”
3. Brief facts of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.