Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI, J
SMT. VIJAYALAKSHMI – Appellant
Versus
SMT. NAGARATHNAMMA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. brief facts as stated (Para 2) |
| 2. it was stated, suit was decreed (Para 3) |
| 3. it was stated, since preliminary decree (Para 4 , 5 , 7 , 8 , 10) |
| 4. sri v.b.siddaramaiah, learned counsel (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. heard learned counsel and perused (Para 13) |
| 6. from above, it is seen (Para 14) |
| 7. said claim is sought to be substantiated (Para 16) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Challenging judgment and decree dated 22.11.2014 passed by I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Chitradurga, in R.A. no.41/2013 and judgment and decree dated 02.01.2013 passed by I Additional Civil Judge, Chitradurga, in Misc.no.08/2005, this appeal is filed.
2. Brief facts as stated are that appellant-petitioner in Misc.no.08/2005 filed for determination of mesne profits as per preliminary decree dated 28.06.1997 passed in O.S.no.1491/1992. In said petition, it was stated, petitioner had filed O.S.no.1491/1992 for partition, separate possession and mesne profits in suit properties bearing Sy.no.47/P of Kelagote village, Chitradurga, measuring 4 Acres 12 Guntas and house, from date of suit i.e., 28.11.1992.
3. It was stated, suit was decreed on 28.06.1997, granting petitioner and her daughter, half share in suit properties along wit
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
