Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M. NAGAPRASANNA, J
SRI SHAILESH KUMAR V. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the complaint and context of the incident. (Para 3 , 7) |
| 2. arguments of the petitioner and respondent. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. the element of intention in offences under the sc/st act. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. importance of intention for penalties under the sc/st act. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. investigative officer requirements under the act. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 6. conclusion on quashing certain charges and sustaining ipc offences. (Para 16 , 17) |
ORDER
2. Heard Sri Jaysham Jayasimha Rao, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Smt. K.P.Yashodha, learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondent No.1. Respondent No.2/complainant though served remained unrepresented throughout these proceedings.
A complaint comes to be registered by the 2nd respondent on 14-06-2020 alleging that the petitioner along with others had indulged in certain acts which would become punishable under Sections 506 , 504, 143, 147, 149, 323, 324 and 363 of the IPC. Though the complaint was that certain abuses were made against the son of the 2nd respondent, the FIR comes to be registered only for offences punishable under the IPC as afore-quoted. The background to the allegation is a game of cr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
