Back
B. R. GAVAI, K. VINOD CHANDRAN
P. M. Lokanath – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ownership dispute and fir (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. civil suits filed by appellants (Para 3) |
| 3. fir lodged by respondent no.2 (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. appellants' claim of mala fide (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. absurdity of allegations (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. quashing powers should be sparingly used (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. criminal proceedings quashed (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
JUDGMENT :
1. The present appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 14th November 2013 passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Criminal Petition No. 3850 of 2010, whereby the High Court has dismissed the petition filed by the present appellants under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “Cr.P.C.”) praying thereby to quash proceedings registered in C.C. No.29027 of 2010 pending on the file of IIIrd Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore (for short, “ACMM, Bangalore”).
3. It appears that respondent No.2 and his siblings thereafter attempted to encroach upon the appellants’ suit property and as such the appellants filed a civil suit being O.S. No.11107/2016 in Court of Principal City Civil and S
The court emphasized that criminal proceedings initiated with mala fide intentions and lacking a prima facie case constitute an abuse of process, warranting quashing under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C.
The court established that civil disputes should not be cloaked as criminal offenses to avoid abuse of the judicial process.
The court established that civil disputes should not be cloaked as criminal offenses to avoid abuse of the judicial process.
The court established that civil disputes should not be mischaracterized as criminal offenses to avoid abuse of the judicial process.
Criminal proceedings cannot be maintained when the underlying dispute is purely civil, as it constitutes an abuse of the judicial process.
(1) Exercise of inherent jurisdiction – Appreciation of contradictions or inconsistencies in witness statements lies within exclusive domain of trial Court and not in proceedings under Section 482 Cr....
Criminal proceedings cannot be maintained when the underlying dispute is purely civil, to prevent abuse of the judicial process.
The court ruled that criminal proceedings should not be used to settle civil disputes and can be quashed if they do not establish a prima facie case of criminal offence.
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process when complaints are motivated by civil disputes.
The criminal matters should be given precedence over civil proceedings, and mere pendency of civil suits cannot be a ground to quash the criminal proceedings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
