Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
RAVI V HOSMANI, J
SRI C. MUNISWAMY REDDY, SINCE DEAD BY LRS. – Appellant
Versus
SRI RAVINDRA KUMAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the plaintiff's claims and defendant's responses. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. trial court's findings on key issues. (Para 6 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. arguments regarding adherence to contract and readiness. (Para 9 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. legal precedents affecting role of limitation. (Para 15 , 19) |
| 5. limitations as determined by court findings. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 6. final dismissal of the appeal. (Para 35) |
JUDGMENT
Challenging judgment and decree dated 26.07.2007 passed by Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Anekal in R.A.no.204/2006 (Old no.R.A.no.79/2006) setting aside judgment and decree dated 31.01.2006 passed by Prl. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.), Anekal, in O.S.no.22/2005, this appeal is filed.
2. Appellant herein was original plaintiff in O.S.no.22/2005; while respondent herein was defendant, for sake of convenience, they shall referred to as such in this appeal.
3. Facts as stated are that, O.S.no.22/2005 was filed by plaintiff stating that defendant was owner and in possession of agricultural land bearing Sy.no.1/12 measuring 28 guntas ('suit property' for short) situated at Nekkundi Dommasandra Village, Sarjapura Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru. In respect of same, defendant had entered into agre
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
