Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
H.P. SANDESH, J
MR. N. RAJGOPAL HEBBAR – Appellant
Versus
MRS. PADMAVATHI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of appeals and arbitration agreements. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. analysis of damage quantification and agreement validity. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. citations of case law supporting arbitral decisions. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. court's reflections on legal principles and factual findings. (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 5. final decision - appeals dismissed. (Para 35) |
CAV JUDGMENT
1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondents in all the appeals.
2. These three appeals are filed against the judgment and award passed in A.S.No.9/2014, A.S.No.10/2014 and A.S.No.13/2015 on the file of I Addl. District Judge, Dakshina Kannada, Mangalore wherein modified the award passed by the Arbitrator and appellants are same in all these three appeals and respondents are different and similar judgments are passed in all the matters on the same ground and hence taken up together for consideration.
3. In M.F.A.No.5460/2016, the case of the claimant before the Arbitrator is that there was an agreement to sell standing timber between Sri.M.Ananda and respondents in this appeal are the legal representatives of M.Ananda and common claimant is Sri.Rajagopala Hebbar and a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
