PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
M NARASIMHAMURTHY – Appellant
Versus
SRI RAMU – Respondent
The petitioner/plaintiff No.4 in O.S.No.254/2002 on
the file of the II Additional Civil Judge (Jr. Dvn), Bengaluru
Rural District, Bengaluru (for short, ‘Trial Court’) is before
this
Court
questioning
order
dated 15.07.2023
on
I.A.No.1/2022 rejecting the application filed under Order
26 Rule 9 of CPC.
Heard the learned counsel Sri.M.S.Nagaraja for
petitioner/plaintiff
No.4
and
learned
counsel
Ms.S.Aishwarya for Sri.Rajeshwara.P.N., learned counsel
for respondents No.1 to 3. Perused the writ petition
papers.
Learned counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff No.4
would submit that after completion of recording of
evidence, petitioner/plaintiff No.4 filed I.A.No.1/2022
under Order 26 Rule 9 of CPC praying to appoint Court
Commissioner for conducting survey of schedule property
and to prepare sketch by identifying the encroached
portion of land measuring 0.37 guntas in Sy.No.20/2 and
- 5 -
20/3 of Sonnenahalli Village, Kengeri Hobli, Bengaluru
South Taluk. Learned counsel would submit that as the
defendants have encroached western portion of the suit
schedule
property,
it
has
become
necessary
for
petitioner/plaintiff No.4 to file application for appointment
of Commissioner to find out t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.