Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M G UMA, J
KUMCHAPU RAM PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE BY THYAMAGUNDLU POLICE STATION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bail sought based on alleged false implication and innocence. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. arguments against bail focused on serious allegations and procedural compliance. (Para 4) |
| 3. court finds strong evidence against the petitioner, barring bail under specific sections. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. court dismisses the bail petition. (Para 9) |
ORDER
The petitioner-accused No.2 is before this Court seeking grant of bail in Crime No.9/2022 of Thyamagondlu Police Station, Bengaluru, registered for the offence punishable under Section 20 (B) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act , (for short, 'the Act'), on the basis of the first information lodged by the informant-Sri Chikkanarashima.
2. Heard Sri.Sandeep H.S., learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri.H.S.Shankar, learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent-State. Perused the materials placed on record.
3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is arrayed as accused No.2. He is innocent and law abiding citizen. He has not committed any offence as alleged. He has been falsely implicated in the matter without any basis. He was apprehended on 01.02.2022 and since then he is in judicial cu
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
