Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
K. Natarajan, J
PARAMESHWARAPPA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal filed to contest the conviction of the appellant. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. evidence presented shows assault happened during a public event with prior enmity. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. analysis of evidence concluded that grievous hurt occurred without a murderous intent. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. conviction modified from attempted murder to grievous hurt based on evidentiary findings. (Para 12 , 13) |
JUDGMENT
2. Heard the arguments of learned counsel for the appellant and learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent-State.
4. The case of the prosecution is that on the complaint of PW.1-Omkarappa, whose statement was recorded by the Police in the hospital on 16.03.2010, it is alleged that as per Ex.P.1 that on 15.03.2010 in the evening at about 6.00 p.m., he was driving the tractor, the accused came in front of complainant's motorcycle by staring at him and in the night, at about 10.00 p.m., when the complainant and others were dancing in front of the procession of Narasimhaswamy in the village fair, the accused with an intention to commit murder, came and picked up quarrel, abused him in filthy language and squeezed his testicles and caused inner injuries to the vita
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
