Defendant No.2 preferred this second appeal being

aggrieved by the impugned judgment and decree dated

18.09.2010 passed in R.A.No.86/2007 on the file of the

learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Mysuru

(hereinafter referred to as 8First Appellate Court9 for brevity),

allowing the appeal, setting aside the judgment and decree

dated 27.07.2007 passed in O.S.No.11/2006 on the file of the

learned Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.) at T.Narasipura (hereinafter

referred to as 8the trial Court9 for brevity) and decreeing the

suit of the plaintiff for specific performance of the agreement

for sale dated 01.08.2002 in favour of the plaintiff and

directing defendant No.2 to join defendant No.1 in executing

the sale deed.

2.

For the sake of convenience, parties are referred

to as per their status and rank before the Trial Court.

3.

Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff filed

the suit O.S.No.11/2006 before the trial Court against

defendant Nos.1 and 2 seeking specific performance of the

agreement for sale and direct the defendants to execute the

3

sale deed in her favour in respect of the schedule property. It

is contended by the plaintiff that she entered into an

agreement for sale