HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA
SRI D L GANESH – Appellant
Versus
SRI SAMPATH KUMAR M N – Respondent
Heard Sri.Prasad.K.R.Rao, learned counsel appearing for
Sri.Venkatesh Somareddy, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2.
The petitioner is before this Court calling in question
proceedings in C.C.No.4459/2015, in particular, an order dated
27.12.2021. The order dated 27.12.2021 reads as follows:
“Counsel for complainant filed application
U/sec.65(B) of Indian Evidence Act, with a prayer
to
permit
him
to
producing
the
Electronics
documents i.e., cash book and balance sheet and
getting marked as exhibits in favour of the
complainant.
On the other had counsel for accused filed
objection and denied all the averments in the
3
application
and
contended
that,
the
present
application does not disclose the requirements
laidown in Sec.65(B) (4) of Indian Evidence Act.
Perused the application, objection and order
sheet. The complainant is further examined and got
marked Ex.P5 to 7. In the meanwhile complainant
has produced some computerized documents along
with the application.
Perused
the documents,
in
this regard
admissibility of electronic records the Hon’ble court
can be consider at the at the time of judgment.
Hence, Complainant is permitted to marking of
documents.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.